<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Vintage Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petestrobl.com/2007/10/the-vintage-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petestrobl.com/2007/10/the-vintage-myth/</link>
	<description>Writings and Reviews from Pete Strobl, Music Producer, Vocal Coach &#38; Bass Player</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:03:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.petestrobl.com/2007/10/the-vintage-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petestrobl.com/stage/?p=131#comment-359</guid>
		<description>I once met someone who traded 2 of his motorcycles and several thousand dollars in cash for a 1957 Les Paul goldtop that originally had P-90 pickups but was, as he put it, professionally routed and then fitted with 1959 humbuckers.  As he was nice enough to let me try it, I felt very awkward when he asked me &quot;what I thought?&quot;.   I guess I must have hesitated as he then quickly told me that he had bought it &quot;for the wood&quot;.  I guess he must have sensed that I was not impressed with the guitar at all.  It felt no different than any other Les Paul I had played save for, perhaps, some duds I may have run into over the years.  I was very disappointed with that guitar and I felt kind of bad for the guy.  My guess is that he paid a lot of money for a guitar that wasn&#039;t worth it then, and still isn&#039;t worth it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once met someone who traded 2 of his motorcycles and several thousand dollars in cash for a 1957 Les Paul goldtop that originally had P-90 pickups but was, as he put it, professionally routed and then fitted with 1959 humbuckers.  As he was nice enough to let me try it, I felt very awkward when he asked me &#8220;what I thought?&#8221;.   I guess I must have hesitated as he then quickly told me that he had bought it &#8220;for the wood&#8221;.  I guess he must have sensed that I was not impressed with the guitar at all.  It felt no different than any other Les Paul I had played save for, perhaps, some duds I may have run into over the years.  I was very disappointed with that guitar and I felt kind of bad for the guy.  My guess is that he paid a lot of money for a guitar that wasn&#8217;t worth it then, and still isn&#8217;t worth it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.petestrobl.com/2007/10/the-vintage-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petestrobl.com/stage/?p=131#comment-77</guid>
		<description>A very good article.  The vintage guitar market has become so ridiculous that it&#039;s laughable.  Actually, what started the vintage market was the garbage that Fender and many of the other guitar companies were putting out in the late 1960&#039;s and all throughout the 1970&#039;s.  Since then, almost all the guitar companies are now putting out very decent instruments, probably just as good, if not better than what was being made in the 1950&#039;s.  If Fender was building guitars throughout the late 60&#039;s and all through the 70&#039;s the way they are building them now, there wouldn&#039;t be any vintage market at all.   Hey, what&#039;s the reason for buying a guitar in the first place?  I hope you answered, &quot;To make music!&quot;.  If you think that spending $30,000 on an old Fender is going to make you a better musician, then you&#039;re not a musician at all.  At best, you&#039;re a daydreaming performer.   Pick up a new guitar or a used one that is reasonably priced, pick up a good amp and play.  Practice.  Play.  Practice.  Play.  Practice. Play.  Practice.  Play.  That&#039;s what music is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good article.  The vintage guitar market has become so ridiculous that it&#8217;s laughable.  Actually, what started the vintage market was the garbage that Fender and many of the other guitar companies were putting out in the late 1960&#8242;s and all throughout the 1970&#8242;s.  Since then, almost all the guitar companies are now putting out very decent instruments, probably just as good, if not better than what was being made in the 1950&#8242;s.  If Fender was building guitars throughout the late 60&#8242;s and all through the 70&#8242;s the way they are building them now, there wouldn&#8217;t be any vintage market at all.   Hey, what&#8217;s the reason for buying a guitar in the first place?  I hope you answered, &#8220;To make music!&#8221;.  If you think that spending $30,000 on an old Fender is going to make you a better musician, then you&#8217;re not a musician at all.  At best, you&#8217;re a daydreaming performer.   Pick up a new guitar or a used one that is reasonably priced, pick up a good amp and play.  Practice.  Play.  Practice.  Play.  Practice. Play.  Practice.  Play.  That&#8217;s what music is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.petestrobl.com/2007/10/the-vintage-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petestrobl.com/stage/?p=131#comment-76</guid>
		<description>hAHA-lOVING IT!
speshly the &quot;10 out of 10 mint &quot;sale description-its such a turnoff-I like &quot;this ones a players guitar&quot;
you now its almost certainly setup properly and you can play it on stage without being embarassed by how shiny it isnt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hAHA-lOVING IT!<br />
speshly the &#8220;10 out of 10 mint &#8220;sale description-its such a turnoff-I like &#8220;this ones a players guitar&#8221;<br />
you now its almost certainly setup properly and you can play it on stage without being embarassed by how shiny it isnt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

